Friday, December 07, 2012

ORDER OF SALVATION PART TWO


The Root Issues 
                     Erickson believes conversion as man’s respond towards the universal calling of God whereas Grudem believes conversion as the regeneration work of God for man to be ready to receive believe in God. The idea of conversion as the first step derived from the Arminian view of conditional election and man’s free will. Regeneration as the first step derived from the Calvinist view of unconditional election. The two positions view from different ankle such as Arminian from the choice of man and Calvinist from the choice of God. Erickson’s order of salvation[1] is 1. Effectual Calling 2.Conversion (faith and repentance) and 3. Regeneration. Whereas Grudem’s list[2] seem to be much longer and more explicit such as 1. Election (God’s choice of people to be saved) 2. The gospel call (proclaiming the message of the gospel) 3. Regeneration (being born again) 4. Conversion (faith and repentance) 5. Justification (right legal standing) 6. Adoption (membership in God’s family) 7. Sanctification (right conduct of life) 8. Perseverance (remaining a Christian) 9. Death (going to be with the Lord) 10. Glorification (receiving a resurrection body).  The understanding of the decree of God and the freedom of man diverted the two positions noticeably. Understanding the role of God in one’s life has been essential part of understanding the order of salvation. According to Erickson, God has a definite plan for the entire history and it is firmly supported by the Bible.[3] He proposed that the word “foreordain” bears a broader term and the word “predestinate” refers to a narrower term having to do with election or reprobation or both.[4] On the other hand, Grudem define election as “Election is an act of God before creation in which he chooses some people to be saved, not on account of any foreseen merit in them, but only because of his sovereign good pleasure.”[5] The paper will further discuss the nature of God’s plan or decree for salvation and man’s part in the order of salvation.

God’s plan in General
                     According to Erickson there are at least nine factors of God’s decree in General and the following are parts of it; 1. God’s decree is from all eternity (Psalm 139:16, Isaiah 22:11, Ephesians 1:4; 3:11; 2 Tim. 1:9; 2 Tim. 1:10). God’s started His plan even before the foundation of the world, from the beginning of the time. 2. God’s plan and the decisions contained therein are free on God’s part: Isaiah 40:13-14; Rom 11:34; Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 2:7.[6] From the beginning of time, God’s decreed out of His own free will according to His wisdom. God does not need human wisdom to make any of His decree. God freely chose to create for His purpose, with His love. 3. In the ultimate sense, the purpose of God’s plan is for His glory  Col. 1:16; Eph. 1:5–6; Rev. 4:11; Isa. 48:11; Ezek. 20:9[7]. From the beginning of the call of Abraham to the invitation of Jesus Christ for salvation, everything is for the glory of Himself. According to His eternal decree, God provided the means of salvation in order to fulfill His love for Human and their welfare. However, salvation is not the ultimate end but the beginning of proclaiming the glory of God to the entire world. 4. God’s decree is efficacious means all His decrees from eternity will surely come to pass (Isa. 14:24, 27).[8]But the plans of the LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of his heart through all generations” (Ps. 33:11). 5. God’s decree relates primarily to what God himself does in terms of creating, preserving, directing, and redeeming.[9] God is the primary source and center of the cosmos. God’s decrees always have relationship with His creation. God always involved in the life of human and even in the natural changes of the World. On the other hand, Grudem’s interpretation of God’s decree for man can be understood as unconditional election. For Grudem, God exercises sovereign choice over everything, He destined the elect to be His sons (Eph. 1:5). He said, “God chose us simply because he decided to bestow his love upon us. It was not because of any foreseen faith or foreseen merit in us.[10] Grudem argues that, “It is unconditional because it is not conditioned upon anything that God sees in us that makes us worthy of his choosing us.[11]  Therefore, Grudem define the Regeneration work as,
                “It Comes Before Saving Faith Using the verses quoted above,
                 we have defined regeneration to be the act of God awakening spiritual life                                                  
                 within us, bringing us from spiritual death to spiritual life. On this definition,                                           
                 it is natural to understand that regeneration comes before saving faith. It is in
                 fact this work of God that gives us the spiritual ability to respond to God in faith.
                 However, when we say that it comes “before” saving faith, it is important to       
                   remember that they usually come so close together that it will ordinarily seem
                   to us that they are happening at the same time.”[12]

Grudem’s proposal of order of salvation solely builds upon the unconditional election of God whereas Erickson based his proposal on conditional election of God. For Erickson unconditional election contradict the freedom of man. Erickson said, “Logically prior to the Bible’s teaching that God has specially chosen some to have eternal life is its vivid picture of the natural lostness, blindness, and inability of humans to respond in faith to the opportunity for salvation.[13] Therefore, Erickson made a conclusion that conversion is the first in the order of salvation.

Conclusion
                   First, both Conversion and Regeneration cannot be solely the work of either God or man. God always actively involved in creation, sustaining, redemption throughout the whole Bible. On the other hand, human freedom could never be independent from God according to Biblical understanding of salvation. Though, God do  not need to depending on human respond in making decision but human freedom to make decision cannot be separated from the salvation planning of God. Second, if the fall of man is solely the result of man’s wrong decision and action than there must be some part for man to play in the general invitation of God for salvation. Third, in Romans 12 start with the word “therefore” in which Paul encourage believers who are already saved to transform more like Jesus Christ. In the first 11 chapters of Romans Paul persuaded the readers about the inability to do good works to save themselves and the way for salvation for both Jews and Gentiles likewise in Ephesians chapter two. The regeneration work of God and even adoption of God instantly begin with conversion.  Ephesians 2:10 said, For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.” Therefore, both conversion and regeneration are continues work rather than one after another. I disagree with Grudem in the area of regeneration as solely the work of God. Both Matthew 7:21-27 and Romans 12:1-3 demonstrate God’s ability to transform us and man’s responsibility to be active in obedience to God in the process of regeneration and conversion. However, regeneration always seems to be the unspoken expectation from conversion. For example in Romans 12 Paul said “therefore…present your body etc…”   Since the Bible clearly promise salvation for whoever believes in Jesus, faith becomes the essential part of both conversion and regeneration. With faith alone one received salvation and also with faith alone one becomes obedient to God. If both Erickson and Grudem agreed on conversion as the combination of faith and repentance. I will propose that both Conversion and Regeneration are the two sides of the result of faith in the grace of God. 



             [1] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 942.
                   [2] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17122-17127). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

                    [3] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 371.                      
                    [4] Ibid.
                    [5]Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17140-17142). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

                    [6] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 376-379 
                     [7] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 379
                      [8]Ibid.  379-380
                      [9]Ibid.  380

                      [10] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17350-17352). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.
                        [11] Ibid.


                        [12] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17953-17955). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

                        [13] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 937.

ORDER OF SALVATION PART ONE


Compare to Theravada Buddhism, Christianity has a completely new set of life and worldview. First of all, life is not in a circle of reincarnation but in a horizontal journey according to God’s plan. Life is a gift from God and there is a time for every human being to live on this earth (1 Samuel 2:6; Job 1:21). Though both faiths seem to agree that man will bear the consequences of the choices that they made but Christian’s view on man’s freedom of choice is more complex to understand. In Christianity one’s moral deeds does not define a person’s fate in the next life. Man is not the subject but God is the center of everything for believers of Christian faith. Salvation in Christianity is solely depending upon the plan and work of God. Therefore, understanding the plan of God has been the key major subject in Christendom. On the other hand, the extent and the implications of man’s free will go hand in hand with the plan of God. In general salvation planning God can be understand as “God’s plans set with eternal purposes according to the counsel of His will, whereby only for His glory.” The bible clearly stated that God is good and His plan will never fail. Proverbs 19:21 said, “We may make a lot of plans, but the Lord will do what he has decided,” (Contemporary English Version). Therefore, the extend of God’s decree and the margin of man’s freedom is a major subject in dealing with a person’s life and worldview in Christianity. God is the creator and He is sovereign over all His creation including over man. In fact the flow of Biblical stories repeatedly highlights the tension between God’s plan and man’s decisions (e.g. the fall of man in Genesis 3:1-24; the salvation planning of God (John 14:6). A Christian’s understanding of Creator verses created being and God’s way verses man’s choice is the key driving mechanism in life on this earth and eternity. I believe that both conversion and regeneration are not competing issues but they are rather completing each other’s sentences in the flow of Biblical metanarrative.  The understanding of both the priority of Conversion (Erickson) and priority of Regeneration (Grudem) derived from the Bible and therefore the paper will be re-examining the existing presuppositions in the light of the paper’s position which is both conversion and regeneration are the two side of salvation. In order to understand what comes first in the order of salvation the paper used the role of God and man in the order of salvation. Without understanding the role of God and man in salvation plan it will be difficult to define the order salvation.

The Root Issues 
                     Erickson believes conversion as man’s respond towards the universal calling of God whereas Grudem believes conversion as the regeneration work of God for man to be ready to receive believe in God. The idea of conversion as the first step derived from the Arminian view of conditional election and man’s free will. Regeneration as the first step derived from the Calvinist view of unconditional election. The two positions view from different ankle such as Arminian from the choice of man and Calvinist from the choice of God. Erickson’s order of salvation[1] is 1. Effectual Calling 2.Conversion (faith and repentance) and 3. Regeneration. Whereas Grudem’s list[2] seem to be much longer and more explicit such as 1. Election (God’s choice of people to be saved) 2. The gospel call (proclaiming the message of the gospel) 3. Regeneration (being born again) 4. Conversion (faith and repentance) 5. Justification (right legal standing) 6. Adoption (membership in God’s family) 7. Sanctification (right conduct of life) 8. Perseverance (remaining a Christian) 9. Death (going to be with the Lord) 10. Glorification (receiving a resurrection body).  The understanding of the decree of God and the freedom of man diverted the two positions noticeably. Understanding the role of God in one’s life has been essential part of understanding the order of salvation. According to Erickson, God has a definite plan for the entire history and it is firmly supported by the Bible.[3] He proposed that the word “foreordain” bears a broader term and the word “predestinate” refers to a narrower term having to do with election or reprobation or both.[4] On the other hand, Grudem define election as “Election is an act of God before creation in which he chooses some people to be saved, not on account of any foreseen merit in them, but only because of his sovereign good pleasure.”[5] The paper will further discuss the nature of God’s plan or decree for salvation and man’s part in the order of salvation.




             [1] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 942.
             [2] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17122-17127). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

             [3] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 371.                      
              [4] Ibid.
           [5]Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17140-17142). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.


Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Ephesians 6:10-20 Stand Still Strong in/after the Storm

10 Finallymy brethren,
             be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might
                                 Put on the whole armor of God, that you  
                                                may be able to stand against 
                                                                           the schemes of the devil
                                                 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood,
                                                 but against the rulers, against the               
                                                 authorities, against the cosmic powers      
                                                 over this present darkness, against the
                                                 spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly       
                                                 places
13 Therefore 
                     take up the whole armor of God, that you
                                                may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done               
                                                all, to stand firm. 

14 Stand thereforehaving
                                 fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of      
                                 righteousness, 15 and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the    
                                 readiness given by the gospel of peace. 16 In all circumstances take  
                                 up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming  
                                 darts of the evil one; 17 and take the helmet of salvation, and the       
                                 sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,  

18 praying at all times in the Spiritwith all prayer and supplication. To that
                         endkeep alert with all perseverancemaking supplication for
                                                   all the saints
                                               19 and also for me, that
                                                              words may be given to me in opening my         
                                                              mouth boldly to proclaim the mystery of the        
                                                              gospel, 20 for which Iam an ambassador in chains,  
                                                              that I may declare it boldlyas I ought to speak.



Stand Still Strong in/after the Storm 

Paul used the word “brethren” only in this last exaltation section in the whole book of Ephesians. Paul is calling believers as his comrades in the extension and expansion of the Kingdom of God. The conclusion message is to prepare the mind and heart of believers to be able to withstand the power of darkness in coming days of evil. The reality is that Paul facing obstacles and opposition in preaching the gospel and in proclamation of good news. He is physically restricted in chain and facing injustice prosecution. Though it is possible for people to see that Paul is facing prosecution from those who oppose and reject the gospel. However, Paul tries to convince the readers that the real enemy is not the people with flesh and blood but powerful evil sources. In another word, Paul help the readers to see beyond the hatred that believer could accumulate from those people who persecuted them. Paul said the enemy is not those people with flesh and blood but the Devil. The great commission of Jesus Christ also faces the great opposition from powerful spiritual realms. Paul is not calling people to put on the armor of God in order to attack the Spiritual power stations rather urging them to be able to withstand in the stormy day. To take up the armor of God literally means taking up a stand on God’s side or to be the soldiers of God. The purpose of taking up the armor of God is to be able to withstand the evil forces. In another word, there is no victory outside of God’s army camp.
              From the beginning of this conclusio message , Paul deliberately urge believers to be Strong in the Lord, under the Shadow of His mighty Hand. The calling to be strong in the Lord bring readers memory back to Psalm 91. In Psalm 91, the Psalmist proclaims that peaceful rest for those who take refuge under the shadow of God. Ephesians 6:10 is the message of reassurance for believer who are facing opposition because they are taking refuge under the shadow  of God almighty. Paul said be strong in the Lord. The palpable way to be strong in the Lord is by taking the Armor that God prepared (in ahead of time). Careful examination of the usage of “the Armor of God” means “the armor that God already prepared.” The armor of God is not something new, but something that God prepared in ahead of time for those who take refuge in Him.  In Ephesians 6 Paul is borrowing the usage of Isaiah to describe the armor of God (Isaiah 11:5, Isaiah 59:17a, Isaiah 52:7a, Isaiah 59:17b, Isaiah 49:2a). Paul used the language of changing cloth in the Ancient Near East which is “Put On”. The armour of God should be look individual as well as a whole. The general interpretation of the armour of God could be “holistic transformation into God-likeness.” In Colossians 3:5-12, Paul used the same language of “Putting Off” and “Putting On.” However, in Ephesian 6 did not talk about putting off but to put on the armor of God. Therefore, in the light of Paul’s usage of the word “put on”, it is safe to say that the armor of God is a metaphorical usage of God-likeness. It is a calling to do the will of God, to pattern their life after their creator.
The purpose for putting on the armor of God is to be able to withstand in the evil day (v13). It is like to be preparing for the unexpected coming days of destruction. Not every day is stormy day. The storm comes always unexpectedly. Not every day believers will face difficulties, temptations. But destruction always comes unexpectedly. In such situation Paul is saying that believes must be able to withstand because they already put on the armor of God. Therefore, the armor of God is a permanent uniform for believers.
Though believers are not competing against people with flesh and blood but the result of the attack of evil can be physical sense. The message of Paul to put on and to withstand in the day of evil bring back our memory of Jesus’s conclusio message in Matthew 7. After preaching and giving so much of Kingdom principles, Jesus said whoever put what He preached into practice will be able to withstand when the storm and rain hit. Therefore, the armor of God is God-likeness character, doing the will of God, following Him closely. Those who take refuge in God will be always strong. In another word, without God there is no victory. The scene of after storm always present destroyed houses, life and hopeless situation. Yes, the storm may hit us but we will be able to withstand, we will be able to Stand Still Strong in our God.
In his final part of this conclusio message, Paul urge believers to pray for him to be continues to preach despite and in spite of his physical hopeless situation in chain. Paul used the word “boldly” in each sentence of the last two sentences: “boldly to proclaim and declare it boldly.”  Though the storm hit him and he is going through violent raging sea, Paul is Standing Still Strong to preach the gospel. This is the key message of the passage. Believers are to Stand Still Strong to do what God called them to do even in the day of evil. Paul walks what he preached. His life is a living testimony for Ephesians, especially people whose faith are shaken by both internal and external strong forces. Paul said Stand Still Strong in the Storm. Amen