Friday, December 07, 2012

ORDER OF SALVATION PART TWO


The Root Issues 
                     Erickson believes conversion as man’s respond towards the universal calling of God whereas Grudem believes conversion as the regeneration work of God for man to be ready to receive believe in God. The idea of conversion as the first step derived from the Arminian view of conditional election and man’s free will. Regeneration as the first step derived from the Calvinist view of unconditional election. The two positions view from different ankle such as Arminian from the choice of man and Calvinist from the choice of God. Erickson’s order of salvation[1] is 1. Effectual Calling 2.Conversion (faith and repentance) and 3. Regeneration. Whereas Grudem’s list[2] seem to be much longer and more explicit such as 1. Election (God’s choice of people to be saved) 2. The gospel call (proclaiming the message of the gospel) 3. Regeneration (being born again) 4. Conversion (faith and repentance) 5. Justification (right legal standing) 6. Adoption (membership in God’s family) 7. Sanctification (right conduct of life) 8. Perseverance (remaining a Christian) 9. Death (going to be with the Lord) 10. Glorification (receiving a resurrection body).  The understanding of the decree of God and the freedom of man diverted the two positions noticeably. Understanding the role of God in one’s life has been essential part of understanding the order of salvation. According to Erickson, God has a definite plan for the entire history and it is firmly supported by the Bible.[3] He proposed that the word “foreordain” bears a broader term and the word “predestinate” refers to a narrower term having to do with election or reprobation or both.[4] On the other hand, Grudem define election as “Election is an act of God before creation in which he chooses some people to be saved, not on account of any foreseen merit in them, but only because of his sovereign good pleasure.”[5] The paper will further discuss the nature of God’s plan or decree for salvation and man’s part in the order of salvation.

God’s plan in General
                     According to Erickson there are at least nine factors of God’s decree in General and the following are parts of it; 1. God’s decree is from all eternity (Psalm 139:16, Isaiah 22:11, Ephesians 1:4; 3:11; 2 Tim. 1:9; 2 Tim. 1:10). God’s started His plan even before the foundation of the world, from the beginning of the time. 2. God’s plan and the decisions contained therein are free on God’s part: Isaiah 40:13-14; Rom 11:34; Rom. 11:36; 1 Cor. 2:7.[6] From the beginning of time, God’s decreed out of His own free will according to His wisdom. God does not need human wisdom to make any of His decree. God freely chose to create for His purpose, with His love. 3. In the ultimate sense, the purpose of God’s plan is for His glory  Col. 1:16; Eph. 1:5–6; Rev. 4:11; Isa. 48:11; Ezek. 20:9[7]. From the beginning of the call of Abraham to the invitation of Jesus Christ for salvation, everything is for the glory of Himself. According to His eternal decree, God provided the means of salvation in order to fulfill His love for Human and their welfare. However, salvation is not the ultimate end but the beginning of proclaiming the glory of God to the entire world. 4. God’s decree is efficacious means all His decrees from eternity will surely come to pass (Isa. 14:24, 27).[8]But the plans of the LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of his heart through all generations” (Ps. 33:11). 5. God’s decree relates primarily to what God himself does in terms of creating, preserving, directing, and redeeming.[9] God is the primary source and center of the cosmos. God’s decrees always have relationship with His creation. God always involved in the life of human and even in the natural changes of the World. On the other hand, Grudem’s interpretation of God’s decree for man can be understood as unconditional election. For Grudem, God exercises sovereign choice over everything, He destined the elect to be His sons (Eph. 1:5). He said, “God chose us simply because he decided to bestow his love upon us. It was not because of any foreseen faith or foreseen merit in us.[10] Grudem argues that, “It is unconditional because it is not conditioned upon anything that God sees in us that makes us worthy of his choosing us.[11]  Therefore, Grudem define the Regeneration work as,
                “It Comes Before Saving Faith Using the verses quoted above,
                 we have defined regeneration to be the act of God awakening spiritual life                                                  
                 within us, bringing us from spiritual death to spiritual life. On this definition,                                           
                 it is natural to understand that regeneration comes before saving faith. It is in
                 fact this work of God that gives us the spiritual ability to respond to God in faith.
                 However, when we say that it comes “before” saving faith, it is important to       
                   remember that they usually come so close together that it will ordinarily seem
                   to us that they are happening at the same time.”[12]

Grudem’s proposal of order of salvation solely builds upon the unconditional election of God whereas Erickson based his proposal on conditional election of God. For Erickson unconditional election contradict the freedom of man. Erickson said, “Logically prior to the Bible’s teaching that God has specially chosen some to have eternal life is its vivid picture of the natural lostness, blindness, and inability of humans to respond in faith to the opportunity for salvation.[13] Therefore, Erickson made a conclusion that conversion is the first in the order of salvation.

Conclusion
                   First, both Conversion and Regeneration cannot be solely the work of either God or man. God always actively involved in creation, sustaining, redemption throughout the whole Bible. On the other hand, human freedom could never be independent from God according to Biblical understanding of salvation. Though, God do  not need to depending on human respond in making decision but human freedom to make decision cannot be separated from the salvation planning of God. Second, if the fall of man is solely the result of man’s wrong decision and action than there must be some part for man to play in the general invitation of God for salvation. Third, in Romans 12 start with the word “therefore” in which Paul encourage believers who are already saved to transform more like Jesus Christ. In the first 11 chapters of Romans Paul persuaded the readers about the inability to do good works to save themselves and the way for salvation for both Jews and Gentiles likewise in Ephesians chapter two. The regeneration work of God and even adoption of God instantly begin with conversion.  Ephesians 2:10 said, For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.” Therefore, both conversion and regeneration are continues work rather than one after another. I disagree with Grudem in the area of regeneration as solely the work of God. Both Matthew 7:21-27 and Romans 12:1-3 demonstrate God’s ability to transform us and man’s responsibility to be active in obedience to God in the process of regeneration and conversion. However, regeneration always seems to be the unspoken expectation from conversion. For example in Romans 12 Paul said “therefore…present your body etc…”   Since the Bible clearly promise salvation for whoever believes in Jesus, faith becomes the essential part of both conversion and regeneration. With faith alone one received salvation and also with faith alone one becomes obedient to God. If both Erickson and Grudem agreed on conversion as the combination of faith and repentance. I will propose that both Conversion and Regeneration are the two sides of the result of faith in the grace of God. 



             [1] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 942.
                   [2] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17122-17127). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

                    [3] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 371.                      
                    [4] Ibid.
                    [5]Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17140-17142). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

                    [6] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 376-379 
                     [7] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 379
                      [8]Ibid.  379-380
                      [9]Ibid.  380

                      [10] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17350-17352). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.
                        [11] Ibid.


                        [12] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17953-17955). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

                        [13] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 937.

ORDER OF SALVATION PART ONE


Compare to Theravada Buddhism, Christianity has a completely new set of life and worldview. First of all, life is not in a circle of reincarnation but in a horizontal journey according to God’s plan. Life is a gift from God and there is a time for every human being to live on this earth (1 Samuel 2:6; Job 1:21). Though both faiths seem to agree that man will bear the consequences of the choices that they made but Christian’s view on man’s freedom of choice is more complex to understand. In Christianity one’s moral deeds does not define a person’s fate in the next life. Man is not the subject but God is the center of everything for believers of Christian faith. Salvation in Christianity is solely depending upon the plan and work of God. Therefore, understanding the plan of God has been the key major subject in Christendom. On the other hand, the extent and the implications of man’s free will go hand in hand with the plan of God. In general salvation planning God can be understand as “God’s plans set with eternal purposes according to the counsel of His will, whereby only for His glory.” The bible clearly stated that God is good and His plan will never fail. Proverbs 19:21 said, “We may make a lot of plans, but the Lord will do what he has decided,” (Contemporary English Version). Therefore, the extend of God’s decree and the margin of man’s freedom is a major subject in dealing with a person’s life and worldview in Christianity. God is the creator and He is sovereign over all His creation including over man. In fact the flow of Biblical stories repeatedly highlights the tension between God’s plan and man’s decisions (e.g. the fall of man in Genesis 3:1-24; the salvation planning of God (John 14:6). A Christian’s understanding of Creator verses created being and God’s way verses man’s choice is the key driving mechanism in life on this earth and eternity. I believe that both conversion and regeneration are not competing issues but they are rather completing each other’s sentences in the flow of Biblical metanarrative.  The understanding of both the priority of Conversion (Erickson) and priority of Regeneration (Grudem) derived from the Bible and therefore the paper will be re-examining the existing presuppositions in the light of the paper’s position which is both conversion and regeneration are the two side of salvation. In order to understand what comes first in the order of salvation the paper used the role of God and man in the order of salvation. Without understanding the role of God and man in salvation plan it will be difficult to define the order salvation.

The Root Issues 
                     Erickson believes conversion as man’s respond towards the universal calling of God whereas Grudem believes conversion as the regeneration work of God for man to be ready to receive believe in God. The idea of conversion as the first step derived from the Arminian view of conditional election and man’s free will. Regeneration as the first step derived from the Calvinist view of unconditional election. The two positions view from different ankle such as Arminian from the choice of man and Calvinist from the choice of God. Erickson’s order of salvation[1] is 1. Effectual Calling 2.Conversion (faith and repentance) and 3. Regeneration. Whereas Grudem’s list[2] seem to be much longer and more explicit such as 1. Election (God’s choice of people to be saved) 2. The gospel call (proclaiming the message of the gospel) 3. Regeneration (being born again) 4. Conversion (faith and repentance) 5. Justification (right legal standing) 6. Adoption (membership in God’s family) 7. Sanctification (right conduct of life) 8. Perseverance (remaining a Christian) 9. Death (going to be with the Lord) 10. Glorification (receiving a resurrection body).  The understanding of the decree of God and the freedom of man diverted the two positions noticeably. Understanding the role of God in one’s life has been essential part of understanding the order of salvation. According to Erickson, God has a definite plan for the entire history and it is firmly supported by the Bible.[3] He proposed that the word “foreordain” bears a broader term and the word “predestinate” refers to a narrower term having to do with election or reprobation or both.[4] On the other hand, Grudem define election as “Election is an act of God before creation in which he chooses some people to be saved, not on account of any foreseen merit in them, but only because of his sovereign good pleasure.”[5] The paper will further discuss the nature of God’s plan or decree for salvation and man’s part in the order of salvation.




             [1] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 942.
             [2] Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17122-17127). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.

             [3] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic, 1998), 371.                      
              [4] Ibid.
           [5]Grudem, Wayne (2009-05-18). Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Kindle Locations 17140-17142). Zondervan. Kindle Edition.